User blog comment:IceFireWarden0/Speculations for Season 11/@comment-1886172-20130625033223/@comment-1886172-20130625144428

But how could they do it? Sure the Reds and Blues took out the Meta, when he had only one A.I. mind you, though in that brief time it seemed his enhancements ran fine, but he had already sustained a deal of damage from Tex by that point. Then they defeated the army of Tex robots, again sure. But they had Carolina and Epsilon, I include Epsilon because he wast he one to take out the majority of the Tex robots with his ability and he was the one to put Caboose in rage mode which made him useful in a fight. Point is, they had two of the best Freelancers at the time they did those things. Now they have who I believe was a constant 5 or 6. Sure he's a good shot, but up close they'd annihilate him and they'd get close real quick. I think melee would be good against them, but the two who showed the most skill at that are, again, gone. As for the rest, without Epsilon to enact Caboose's rage, the only one I think that would actually be good at fighting the flood is again his melee. Simmons might be alright if he took a few out with his rocket launcher, and Sarge would be able to protect him with his shotgun if they got too close while Simmons' was reloading. Eh, maybe they could put up a fight. The flood would likely have to be dumbed down, even from a pre-Gravemind state (like in Halo: Combat Evolved).

And I thought they just used energy swords. If they are modified astheticaly, then I could see this theory working again (I've not played it, I thought that they had energy swords sticking out their arms. ;-;).And we already had human antagonists, and a  lot of them, with the Insurrectionists, and with the Meta. Meta in Reconstruction you could say he was an A.I. antagonist as he was controlled by them, but in Recreation and Revelation he was a human one. Plus Wash played antagonist in Revelation. Point being, haven't we had enough human antagonists? Ugh, I think I'm starting to support the Flood theory. ;-;