Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24140363-20140727101435/@comment-24027096-20140924223507

Agent Rhode wrote: NEW RULE FOR THE FORUM: IF YOU DON'T THINK CONTROL IS SOMEONE WE ALREADY KNOW THEN FUCK OFF. THIS IS A FORUM ABOUT WHO CONTROL COULD BE, NOT WHO HE/SHE ISN'T.

I hate to be the one who points this out AGAIN, but you're contradicting yourself Rhode. If you're going to debate/argue/hypothesise-wildly/shove-your-opinion-down-someone's-throat/consider-possibilities (as seems to be the norm in this forum) about who someone IS, automatically you're going to have a process of elimination for who they are NOT. That's just the way it goes.

I do apologise though. I feel like I caused/escalated the argument brewing between Western Gen and Agent Rhode with this ---

"Western Gen appears to be policing this thread like an absolute hawk. Although to be fair, he is well informed. And Agent Rhode, we are entitled to shoot down theories, as you are to shoot down ours. Some people eg Western Gen just like to back up their arguments, even sometimes to the extent of going slightly overboard. Everybody just needs to remain calm. And try not get butthurt when someone inevitably disagrees with you.  [this part is directed at EVERYBODY, before I get attacked] "

That wasn't my intention. But my point about the being butthurt stands. So many people on here are getting OTT-angry about someone else posting different ideas to the ones they have on an internet forum. Someone disagrees with you. So fucking what? Everyone is entitled to an opinion (even if they do turn out to be wrong/are clearly being an idiot)